Remote viewing is the practice of attempting to perceive or describe details about a distant or unseen target through extrasensory perception, purportedly without the use of the normal five senses. Popularized in the 1970s and 1980s through various government-sponsored programs, such as the U.S. military's Stargate Project, remote viewing combines elements of intuition and psychic abilities. While proponents claim success in various applications, including espionage and personal insight, scientific scrutiny often critiques remote viewing as lacking empirical support and replicability.

Like any skill, some are more naturally inclined than others. However, with practice and training it's possible to improve and strengthen this ability.

This site is designed for those with interest in remote viewing, regardless of your experience level. Here you will find information regarding remote viewing, as well as training tools to test and improve your innate abilities.

By analyzing the test data collected, I hope to discover insight into the inner-workings of remote viewing. Based on my own personal experience, I truly believe remote viewing is an genuine, innate sense possessed by humans. Proving this to skeptics, or within a laboratory setting, however - is not so easy. This is because the results are often inconsistent and innacurate, particularly to the untrained. Furthermore, It's difficult to create statistics regarding such an abstract result. Comparing the target to the viewer's results is a very subjective process. Different people create different connections and what one person deems accurate, another may see no such resemblence.

In addition, the level of accuracy is another area for inconsistency. For example, if only one of five targets recorded were considered "accurate" by a third-party, while the others were not - do we consider the level of detail or amount of associations involved? If every detail was recorded in the accurate recording, should each be considered statistically important? If not, we could interpret only one in five as simply chance - despite the high level of accuracy. Considering the target could be any combination of possible objects (practically infinite), a strategy would have to be devised to include these nuances.

Another curiosity is whether the target could be generated AFTER the remote view has been completed? If so, this would open the possibility that time itself is traversed during viewings. If this could be demonstrated - it could perhaps explain the entire remote viewing phenomenon! Are remote targets actually discovered by obtaining future knowledge of the target after it had been revealed? This may explain why the target does not have to be known to anyone beforehand.